Book Review: ‘The Political Economy of Special Economic Zones: Concentrating Economic Development’ by Lotta Moberg

Special economic zones (SEZs) with variations known as free ports, free cities, etc have been created in more than 130 countries over the last half century, and to date some 3,000 plus have been formed. Special economic zones typically have no or low tariffs, low tax rates and light regulations. They range in size from entire cities, like Hong Kong, to single buildings. There have been many successes but even more failures. Lotta Moberg is a very smart international economist, who has studied the pros and cons of SEZs in detail. She presents a very balanced analysis of what works and what does not – and what lessons are to be learned.

Lotta Moberg

In the early 1990s, I chaired an economic transition team in Bulgaria as it attempted to transform itself from a communist to a free market, democratic country. Suggestions were made at the time for the creation of a special economic zone to serve as a model of how a free market economy should work, in the same way that Hong Kong served as a model for China and their many subsequent SEZs. Most Bulgarians at the time were enthusiastic about the creation of a special economic zone, but they could not agree among themselves of where it should be located, with several different regions vying for it. The result was they checkmated each other and nothing was done at the time.

What struck me is the widespread recognition that free trade, free markets, private property protections along with low taxes and regulations were good, hence the support for the concept of a SEZ but not for the whole country as I once suggested out of frustration. Bulgaria now has several limited special economic zones.

In her book, Moberg gives a brief history of SEZs going back to ancient Greece, but then concentrates on modern era SEZs which really started with the rise of export processing zones. These zones were most often fenced off areas, engaged in light manufacturing, and without residential components. Most were focused on developing export industries. Some zones have evolved into major free ports, such as one in Dubai, which is the ninth largest port in the world. Other zones are as small as single factory zones. Some zones are clear additions to local economies, creating more jobs at higher wages; other zones do not justify their costs, particularly when governments have built the infrastructure and the most productive workers are drawn from the rest of the economy into the zone.

Like all forms of economic organization and structure, SEZs have both costs and benefits. Being a former academic, Moberg is comfortable in the language of cost-benefit analysis even though not all her readers may be. She is careful to cite evidence and provide data to support her arguments. The bottom line is she clearly demonstrates properly designed and managed SEZs can have great benefits, or impose disproportionate costs on an economy. There is also no simple answer about which activities are appropriate for a SEZ or how big it should be. Every case is individual, which helps explain the great disparities in outcomes.

Those who create SEZs need to determine where they should be created, but are plagued by not knowing beforehand which activities are going to be the most viable for the zone, and what are the proper incentives that need to be created for the zone to fulfill its potential. The inherent intellectual conflict is with the idea that central planners know best of how to create a free market center.
Moberg is at times a bit cynical about the motivations for creating SEZs which she notes: “when the status quo of protectionism is under threat.” She concludes they are better than the status quo if the alternative is no reform. The book is well balanced between giving concrete and interesting case studies; India, China, the Dominican Republic, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, etc. and relevant economic theories behind the zones.

Again, her conclusions are mixed as to whether the SEZs served as examples of reform for the entire country, as has been largely done in China, or just served as opportunity for the well connected to avoid taxes and regulations in order to increase their own wealth at the expense of the country. Even though a number of SEZs have spurred more general economic reform, there is not much evidence that they have done much to foster general political change. SEZs may help reform in the Arab countries by allowing the use of the British created common law which governs almost all the world’s financial centers, and allowing the full utilization of the skills of women. There are several experiments going on in the world with various types of SEZs at the moment, including the free cities project in Honduras, where I serve on the best practices board. In sum, Moberg is modestly optimistic about the future of SEZs, but coldly realistic about the past and potential failures.

For those who wish to obtain an overall understanding of the potential and pitfalls of SEZs, as well as understanding of the multiple types and past successes and failures, this relatively thin volume provides the best overall description and analysis produced to date.

Previous articleThe offshore future is bright
Next articleConfidence, not confidentiality, is the key to a healthy future for IFCs
Richard W. Rahn

Richard W. Rahn is Chairman of Improbable Success Productions, Chairman of the Institute for Global Economic Growth, and a former Member of the Board (2002-08) of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority.

Richard W. Rahn, Ph.D.
Institute for Global Economic Growth
PO Box 2100
Reston, VA 20195 USA

T.+1 (703) 338 9439, +1 (703) 553 3700
E. [email protected] 



The Institute for Global Economic Growth (IGEG) was formed in 2002 to assist both governments and economic policy organizations in developing and promoting pro-economic growth policies. It is a non-profit (IRS code – 501-C-4) organization.

IGEG provides highly experienced and world class experts from the United States and other countries to assist government officials who are interested in identifying and correcting impediments to economic growth in their own countries. IGEG experts have had senior level experience in monetary, tax, spending, trade, privatization, and regulatory policies and, therefore, are capable of evaluating an entire economy or a subset, such as the financial sector, depending upon the need.

IGEG also provides assistance to economic policy organizations (think tanks) throughout the world. It assists such organizations with policy development, (e.g., programs in tax competition), organizational and financial development, communications strategy, and provides speakers for conferences. IGEG also helps develop coalitions of like minded organizations to improve economic policy making within or among countries, depending upon the issue. IGEG publishes little in its own name, but prefers to aid scholars who publish for their principal organizations.

In Europe, IGEG works closely with its affiliate, the European Coalition for Economic Growth, based in Vienna, Austria. In order to minimize overhead costs, IGEG only contracts for the necessary personnel and experts for the time and location where they are needed, rather than maintaining a large staff. Its experts are drawn from leading American think tanks such as the Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, The American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), the Institute for Research in the Economics of Taxation (IRET), the American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF), the Center for Freedom and Prosperity, the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (SBE Council), and others. IGEG also draws experts from universities, the private sector and think tanks located outside of the U.S.


Institute for Global Economic Growth
PO Box 2100
Reston, VA 20195

T.+1 (703) 338 9439, +1 (703) 553 3700
E. [email protected]