An overview of Caribbean securities exchanges

Read this article in its Magazine format 

Caribbean securities exchanges have existed since the 1969 creation of the Jamaican Stock Exchange; in the last 15 years those exchanges have increased in number and significance. From the creation of the Bermuda Stock Exchange in 1971 to the creation of the Trinidad & Tobago Stock Exchange in 1981, no new exchanges with staying power were added. Beginning with the Barbados Stock Exchange in 1987 and followed by the Bolsa de Valores de la Republica Dominicana in 1991, the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange in 1997, the Bahamas International Securities Exchange and the International Finance Center and Exchange in 1999, and the Eastern Caribbean Securities Exchange in 2001, the region’s financial infrastructure expanded.

Moreover, there are indications that the growth of Caribbean securities exchanges has not yet ended. Multiple exchanges are in the development stage, including the Haitian Stock Exchange, with no immediate plans to open, and the Dutch Caribbean Stock Exchange, which was authorised to begin operations in Q1 2010 but apparently has not yet done so.

A key factor in the expansion of Caribbean stock exchanges was the recognition of two offshore exchanges by the United Kingdom’s government. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs has designated both BISX and CSX as “recognised stock exchanges” under section 1005(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act of 2007, and recognised all securities on these exchanges as “listed on a registered stock exchange” for the purpose of tax legislation, an important designation under UK law for four reasons.

First, UK pension schemes are permitted to hold securities listed on these exchanges, giving companies and funds listed on such an exchange access to a larger market of sophisticated, well-capitalised investors. Second, debt securities satisfying the Eurobond exemption on these exchanges are not required to withhold tax from distributions to parties in the UK. Third, securities listed on these exchanges may be held in tax-advantaged individual savings accounts and personal equity plans. Fourth, there is some inheritance tax advantage to holding securities listed on recognised stock exchanges.

Even where onshore jurisdictions do not directly recognise an offshore exchange, there may still be some benefit to listing on such an exchange. Some studies have found that firms seek to maximise their visibility in markets while minimising disclosure costs.

Because regulation in some Caribbean jurisdictions is less focused on protecting individual retail investors than minimising systemic risk, and thus has lower disclosure requirements, listing on a Caribbean exchange may increase visibility with respect to the institutional investors with a presence there at a low disclosure cost. Further, individual onshore stock exchanges may be willing to recognise offshore exchanges. For example, prior to CSX’s recognition as a recognised stock exchange by HMRC, the London Stock Exchange granted CSX approved organisation status, enabling securities listed on the CSX to become eligible for quotation on the SEAQ (Stock Exchange Automatic Quotation) international trading system and eligible for trading in the LSE’s international equity market.

Caribbean securities exchanges offer exciting opportunities, both for the jurisdictions housing these exchanges and for businesses seeking capital or selling investment products. The exchanges themselves face a choice between at least two potential paths. First, the presence of sophisticated investors gives these exchanges an opportunity to capitalise on their varied business associations offerings by catering to domestic firms or their financial products. By remaining primarily a vehicle for SPVs not featured on onshore exchanges, Caribbean exchanges can capitalise on their competitive advantage in this area. On the other hand, the CSX offers a different possible future. Exchanges can regulate in ways that inspire the confidence of onshore exchanges, which then expand access to markets by cross-listing and offering tax advantages to those investing in these ‘legitimised’ offshore securities. The latter option will dramatically expand the marketability of products, but may trade off with the lighter regulation and low disclosure costs that made investing offshore advantageous in the first place.

Caribbean exchanges will also have to decide how to interact with each other. As more and more of these exchanges spring up, it will be interesting to see whether the various exchanges in the region find it more beneficial to consolidate to reduce transaction costs or remain separate to offer regulatory competition within the region. There is some indication that the exchanges are trending in the direction of consolidation and cooperation, such as the cross-listing arrangements among the CARICOM countries choosing to participate and the establishment of the multi-national Eastern Caribbean Securities Exchange. On the other hand, there is a proliferation of exchanges, each advertising their own comparative advantages. For example, the nascent DCSE advertises its choice of law provision (Netherlands Antilles – a Dutch civil law system) as a unique advantage. More generally, the historical differences among the islands of the Caribbean may make reconciliation and consolidation practically and politically difficult to accomplish.

Stock Exchange 

Country 

Year Created 

HMRCRC 

CARICOM 

Listed Products 

Relevant Law(s) 

Jamaica Stock Exchange (JSE) 

Jamaica 

1969 

Member 

Private Debt
and Equity 

Bank of Jamaica Act (1960), Banking
Act (1992), Financial Services Commission Act (2001) 

Bermuda Stock Exchange (BSX) 

Bermuda (United Kingdom) 

1971 

Recognised 

Equity, Debt 

  

Trinidad and Tobago Stock Exchange
(TTSE)
 

Trinidad & Tobago 

1981 

Member 

Debt,
Equity, Mutual Funds 

Securities Industry Act 1981;
Securities Industry Act 1995 

Barbados Stock Exchange Inc (BSE 

Barbados 

1987 

Member 

Stock,
Mutual Funds 

Securities Exchange Act, Cap 318A,
of 1982; Securities Act 2001 -13 

Bolsa de Valores de la República
Dominicana (BVRD)
 

Dominican Republic 

1991 

Commercial
Paper, Stocks, Government Bonds 

Law 19-00 (Securities Markets Law);
Law 87-01 (Social Security Law); Ley Monetaria y Financiera 

Cayman Islands Stock Exchange (CSX) 

Cayman Islands 

1997 

Recognised 

Equity,
Mutual Funds, Specialised Debt Securities, Eutobonds, Derivative Warrants,
Depositary Receipts 

The Cayman Islands Stock Exchange
Company Law 

Bahamas International Securities
Exchange (BISX)
 

Bahamas 

1999 

Recognised 

Member 

Government
Debt, Private Equity, Mutual Funds 

Securities Industry Act 1999 

International Finance Center and
Exchange IFCE
 

Curaçao (Netherlands) 

1999 

No specific
exclusions 

Netherlands Antilles Ordinance on
the Supervision of Stock Exchanges 1998  

Eastern Caribbean Securities
Exchange (ECSE)
 

Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda,
Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St.
Vincent and the Grenadines 

2001 

Member 

Public and
Private Debt and Equity 

Model Act: Securities Act of 2001 

 

 

SHARE
Previous articleCayman’s financial services industry: as foretold by the past
Next articleThe Relentless Revolution: A history of capitalism
Chad Henson

Chad Henson’s practice consists of intellectual property and other litigation matters, with a particular focus on damages issues that arise in complex commercial cases. Prior to joining Skiermont Puckett LLP, he held academic and research positions at leading research institutions. He also has served as a consultant to professional and academic research institutions, law firms, and financial services firms.

Clifford Chad Henson
Associate
Skiermont Puckett LLP
Chase Tower
2200 Ross Avenue
Suite 4800W
Dallas, Texas 75201

T. +1 (214) 978 6600
E. chad.henson@skiermontpuckett.com
W: skiermontpuckett.com 

Skiermont Puckett

Complex cases require trial lawyers with an enhanced tool set and a different perspective. Being a zealous advocate is important, but it isn’t enough.  Complex cases call for creative and strategic thinkers – trial lawyers who simultaneously see the mountaintops and the weeds, the forest and the trees.  Complex cases demand trial lawyers who have experience leading teams into high-stakes legal battles, and who never let today’s task list obscure their focus from the only question that matters – how are we going to win? Complex cases require trial lawyers who use cutting-edge legal tools to control their clients’ legal costs. Complex cases need trial lawyers who know how to simplify complexity. 

 

Chase Tower
2200 Ross Avenue
Suite 4800W
Dallas, Texas 75201


T. +1 (214) 978 6600
E. chad.henson@skiermontpuckett.com
W: skiermontpuckett.com